Tag: Utah Appeals Criminal Cases
-
State v. Qayum, 2025 UT App 178
The Utah Court of Appeals has affirmed a conviction for enticing a minor in State v. Qayum, a case that arose from an online sting operation. In doing so, the…
-
State v. Bell Resets the Standard for Theft-of-Rental-Vehicle Prosecutions
In State v. Bell, 2025 UT App 169, the Utah Court of Appeals issued a significant decision that reshapes how prosecutors must approach theft-of-rental-vehicle cases. The court vacated Randi Lou…
-
State v. Smith, 2025 UT 45
In a recent decision, the Utah Supreme Court made it clear: judges—not juries—must decide if criminal charges are too old to prosecute. The ruling in State v. Smith, 2025 UT…
-
State v. McDonald (2025 UT App 127)
The Utah Court of Appeals has thrown out an aggravated assault conviction after finding that the defense attorney gave jurors the wrong definition of the word “likely.” This mistake confused…
-
State v. Menzies, 2025 UT 38
August 30, 2025 – The Utah Supreme Court has halted the execution of death row inmate Ralph Leroy Menzies, ruling that the district court erred when it denied his petition…
-
State v. Barner, 2020 UT App 68
In this appeal the court addressed their standard for review when looking at an issue of a district court’s denial of a motion for a directed verdict.
-
State v. Diviney, 2021 UT App 106
This appeal involved multiple issues, including the claim that the trial court improperly denied a motion for directed verdict. The Court discussed the proper standard of review for this issue.
-
State v. Canton, 2013 UT 44
How should a court determine the ordinary meaning of nontechnical terms of a statute?
-
State v. Pham, 2016 UT App 105
What evidence is sufficient to support a finding of serious bodily injury?
-
State v. Ricks, 2013 UT App 238
Did sufficient evidence support a conviction for depraved indifference murder?
-
State v. Frausto, 2002 UT App 259
What words in jury instructions should the court offer further definition for?
-
State v. Couch, 635 P.2d 89 (Utah 1981)
When must a court further define terms of common usage given in a jury instruction?