Unreasonable Delay – Preliminary Examination

It is the prosecutor's responsibility to move a case forward. Rule 7 requires that a preliminary examination be held within a "reasonable time" but not later than 14 days after requested, if the defendant is in custody for the offense charged in the case.
attorney meeting with client at desk

Prosecution’s Responsibility to Move the Case Forward

When the executive branch of government undertakes to prosecute criminal charges against an individual, the government takes upon itself certain responsibilities, burdens, and obligations that normally must be met through county attorney, district attorney, or city attorney prosecutors.

Some of these are imposed by the Constitution, some are created by the Legislature through statute, and some are required by rules promulgated by the Courts.

Dismissal for “Unreasonable” or “Unconstitutional” Delay

Rule 25 of the Utah Rules of Criminal Procedure (URCP) provides that a judge “shall dismiss the information or indictment when… [t]here is unreasonable delay in bringing the defendant to trial.” Under our Constitution, the prosecution has the responsibility to “prosecute” the case — meaning, to move the case forward. Rule 25 uses the mandatory language of “shall dismiss” in this context.

“Within a Reasonable Time”

Rule 7 of the URCP requires that a preliminary examination in a felony or class A misdemeanor case “must be held within a reasonable time…” The rule further delineates the idea of “reasonable time” by requiring that the examination be held “not later than 14 days [after the hearing is requested] if the defendant is in custody for the offense charged….” The rule allows a 28-day window for holding the hearing “if the defendant is not in custody.” (Note that the rule is technically silent on the required time period if a defendant is in custody, but is not being held on the case at issue.)

Extended for Good Cause

Rule 7 provides that a court may extend the 14- or 28-day period for holding a preliminary examination “for good cause shown” — meaning that if a prosecutor can show a good reason for granting an extension (or continuance) then the court can allow the hearing to be held at a later date.

Defense attorneys can remind the court (and prosecutors as needed) that “good cause” must exist and must be shown before the court should grant an extension. A delay should not be automatically granted. Instead, the rule requires that the prosecution demonstrate “good cause” for an extension.

Subpoenaed to testify? Or just going bowling?

It is common for prosecutors to request a delay for reasons such as a police officer planning to be out of town, or the prosecutor having another hearing scheduled on a particular day. Unavailability is not automatic “good cause” without more. A delay requested because an officer is planning to go bowling with his high school friends should be viewed differently by the court than a delay requested because the police officer who is already under a conflicting court order to appear and provide testimony at a murder trial scheduled at the same time.

Simple scheduling convenience should not be viewed as “good cause” to delay proceedings in a case when a person is being held in jail on the matter.

The Constitution Matters Too

Statutes and procedural rules set out deadlines and other requirements for various actions or filings. But constitutional requirements take precedence, even if the rule or statute is very specific. Both procedural and substantive due process protections should be considered in addition to the speedy trial right.

 

Originally Published: October 16, 2024

How can we help you?

Call us at 801-448-7451, or use this contact form.

    Related Articles

    Good attorneys ignore this statute. Great attorneys understand why.
    Utah’s Affirmative Defense Statute and the Burden of Proof Utah Code section 76-1-502 states that evidence of an affirmative defense (such as...
    December 6, 2024
    Rule 16 Request/Demand for Discovery
    Formal discovery requests are filed by the defense in criminal cases even though constitutional principles of due process should require prosecutors...
    November 22, 2024
    Useful Court Links – Video Hearings
    This page contains links to selected pages related to Utah criminal courts – both state district courts and local justice courts. If you are...
    November 21, 2024

    Ready to explore our other articles?