Can I be charged with texting while driving on private property?

Posted by Stone River Criminal Defense Team

Last Updated: February 17, 2025

Utah’s distracted driving law, Section 41-6a-1716, strictly prohibits engaging in activities like reading, writing, texting, typing, or accessing the internet with your hands while driving. But what does this mean for those who drive on private property?
attorney meeting with client at desk

What Does Utah’s Distracted Driving Law Cover?

According to Utah law, texting or using a handheld device while driving is illegal on any “highway.” But the term “highway” is defined more broadly than you might expect. Under Utah Code, a highway refers to “any public road, street, alley, lane, court, place, viaduct, tunnel, culvert, bridge, or structure laid out or erected for public use.” In other words, this law applies to almost all public roads or structures designed for traffic.

What About Private Property?

Utah’s statutory definition of a “highway” does not typically include private roads, driveways, or parking lots. Therefore, you likely won’t be charged with texting while driving if you’re on private property, like a parking lot or your own driveway. However, that doesn’t make it a safe or responsible choice. Distracted driving can lead to accidents, even on private roads, where pedestrians, other vehicles, or unexpected obstacles may be present.

Should You Text and Drive on Private Property?

Although texting while driving on private property may not result in a criminal charge, it’s still risky. Accidents can happen anywhere, and driving requires your full attention at all times, regardless of where you are. The best practice is to avoid distractions altogether, whether you’re on a public road or private property.

Originally Published: November 20, 2023

How can we help you?

Call us at 801-448-7451, or use this contact form.

    Related Articles

    Case Brief: State v. Lucke, 2025 UT App 49
    In State v. Lucke, 2025 UT App 49, the Utah Court of Appeals overturned a stalking conviction after finding the trial court failed to ensure the...
    May 1, 2025
    State v Brown, 2025 UT App 52
    Facts of the Case Brown shot and killed David after an argument led to David ramming the back of Brown’s vehicle. Earlier Brown had tried to drive...
    May 1, 2025
    Case Brief: State v Austin, 2025 UT App 51
    This case involves an internet sting operation conducted by an undercover police officer posing as someone offering a minor for sex with adults. The...
    April 24, 2025

    Ready to explore our other articles?