Is duress a defense to criminal prosecution in Utah?

Posted by Stone River Criminal Defense Team

Last Updated: February 17, 2025

Duress, coercion, and threats are covered by Utah’s affirmative defense of “compulsion” under Utah Code 76-2-302. The statutory defense of compulsion provides that a person is not guilty of the charged crime if the person was coerced, through the use of actual or threatened unlawful force against the person, or against another person. Imminent Threat […]
attorney meeting with client at desk

Duress, coercion, and threats are covered by Utah’s affirmative defense of “compulsion” under Utah Code 76-2-302. The statutory defense of compulsion provides that a person is not guilty of the charged crime if the person was coerced, through the use of actual or threatened unlawful force against the person, or against another person.

Imminent Threat Requirement

To support a compulsion defense, a threat of force must be imminent. The use or threatened use of force must also be of a nature that “a person of reasonable firmness in [the same] situation would not have resisted.”

A compulsion defense is not available if the person “intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly” created or got into a situation in which duress or threats of force would be likely.

Compulsion as an Affirmative Defense

Compulsion is considered to be an “affirmative” defense, meaning that if evidence is presented that supports it, regardless of whether that evidence is presented by the prosecution or by the defense, then the prosecution must meet the burden of disproving the affirmative defense beyond a reasonable doubt.

Originally Published: November 19, 2023

How can we help you?

Call us at 801-448-7451, or use this contact form.

    Related Articles

    Case Brief: State v Austin, 2025 UT App 51
    This case involves an internet sting operation conducted by an undercover police officer posing as someone offering a minor for sex with adults. The...
    April 24, 2025
    Case Review: In Re: E.M. (2025 UT 8)
    In State of Utah in the Interest of E.M., 2025 UT 8, the Utah Supreme Court upheld a juvenile court’s decision to transfer a 15-year-old to...
    April 17, 2025
    Case Brief: State v. Stubbs, 2025 UT App 48
    In State v. Stubbs, the Utah Court of Appeals addressed the legal standards and procedural requirements for modifying a pretrial detention order. The...
    April 16, 2025

    Ready to explore our other articles?